DOE Announces More Funding From the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act

Nov 30, 2009

The U.S. Energy Secretary, Steven Chu announced more awards from the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act for funding from the Department of Energy.

  • Clemson University will receive up to $45 million for a wind energy test facility that will enhance the performance, durability, and reliability of utility-scale wind turbines.  The Large Wind Turbine Drivetrain Testing facility will enable the U.S., which leads the world in wind energy capacity, to expand development and testing of large-scale wind turbine drive-train systems domestically.  The new facility will be located at the Charleston Naval Complex, a former Navy base in North Charleston, S.C. and will be a part of the Clemson University Restoration Institute campus. The test facility will operate as a non-profit organization with a business model designed for sustainability while providing ongoing state-of-the-art testing to wind turbine manufacturers. These tests of drivetrains are required to demonstrate compliance with wind turbine design standards, reduce wind turbine costs, secure product financing, and reduce the technical and financial risk of deploying mass-produced wind turbine models.  Press Release
  • Small businesses will have $18 million invested to support innovation research, development and deployment of clean energy technologies. In this first phase of funding, 125 grants of up to $150,000 each will be awarded to 107 small advanced technology firms across the U.S. The companies were competitively selected from a pool of 950 applicants through a special fast-track process with an emphasis on near-term commercialization and job creation. Companies that demonstrate successful results with their new technologies and show potential to meet market needs will be eligible for $60 million in a second round of grants in the summer of 2010.  Grants were awarded in each of the following ten topic areas:  Press Release
    1. Advanced Building Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Thermal Load Shifting, and Cool Roofs (15 projects, for up to $2,241,229 total)
    2. Water Usage in Electric Power Production (6 projects, for up to $878,144)
    3. Power Plant Cooling (1 project, $150,000)
    4. Advanced Gas Turbines and Materials (11 projects, for up to $1,637,033)
    5. Sensors, Controls, and Wireless Networks (12 projects, for up to $1,787,061)
    6. Advanced Water Power Technology Development (12 projects, for up to $1,747,259)
    7. Smart Controllers for Smart Grid Applications (8 projects, for up to $1,166,871)
    8. Advanced Solar Technologies (12 projects, for up to $2,783,996)
    9. Advanced Industrial Technologies Development (25 projects, for up to $3,709,564)
    10. Advanced Manufacturing Processes (16 projects, for up to $2,222,110)
  • Thirty-two demonstration projects, which include large-scale energy storage, smart meters, distribution and transmission system monitoring devices, and a range of other smart technologies, will act as models for deploying integrated Smart Grid systems on a broader scale. They were awarded $620 million for projects around the country to demonstrate advanced Smart Grid technologies and integrated systems that will help build a smarter, more efficient, more resilient electrical grid. Applicants say this investment will create thousands of new job opportunities that will include manufacturing workers, engineers, electricians, equipment installers, IT system designers, cyber security specialists, and business and power system analysts.  Press Release
    • In the first group, 16 awards totaling $435 million will support fully integrated, regional Smart Grid demonstrations in 21 states, representing over 50 utilities and electricity organizations with a combined customer base of almost 100 million consumers.
    • In the second group, an additional 16 awards for a total of $185 million will help fund utility-scale energy storage projects that will enhance the reliability and efficiency of the grid, while reducing the need for new electricity plants.
    • Full list of selected projects (PDF)
Advanced Water Power Technology Development (12 projects, for up to $1,747,259)


U.S. and China Establish Extensive Cooperation on Clean Energy

Nov 18, 2009

U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao have announced the creation of a joint program to develop clean energy, including the creation of a $150 million clean energy research center.  Earlier this week both attended the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit, where they agreed along with 19 other world leaders on a deferral plan for the upcoming climate talks at CopenhagenRead more…

Meeting in Beijing, the two presidents agreed to a seven-point plan designed to speed the development of renewable energy and improve energy efficiency.  The agreement includes the following initiatives:

1.  China Clean Energy Research Center

  • The Center will facilitate joint research and development of clean energy technologies by teams of scientists and engineers from the United States and China, as well as serve as a clearinghouse to help researchers in each country.

U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Clean Energy Research (PDF)

2.  China Electric Vehicles Initiatives

  • Building on the first ever U.S.-China Electric Vehicle Forum in September 2009, the initiative will include joint standards development, demonstration projects in more than a dozen cities, technical road mapping and public education projects. 

U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Electric Vehicles Initiative (PDF)

3.  Energy Efficiency Action Plan

  • Under the new plan, the two countries will work together to improve the energy efficiency of buildings, industrial facilities, and consumer appliances.

U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Energy Efficiency Plan (PDF)

4.  Renewable Energy Partnership

  • Under the partnership, the two countries will develop road maps for wide-spread renewable energy deployment in both countries.  The partnership will also provide technical and analytical resources to states and regions in both countries to support renewable energy deployment and will facilitate state-to-state and region-to-region partnerships to share experience and best practices.

U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Renewable Energy Partnership (PDF)

5.  21st Century Coal

  • The two governments are actively engaging industry, academia, and civil society in advancing clean coal and carbon capture and storage (CSS) solutions.

U.S.-China Fact Sheet on 21st Century Coal (PDF)

6.  Shale Gas Initiative

  • Under the Initiative, the U.S. and China will use experience gained in the United States to assess China’s shale gas potential, promote environmentally-sustainable development of shale gas resources, conduct joint technical studies to accelerate development of shale gas resources in China, and promote shale gas investment in China through U.S.-China Oil and Gas Industry Forum, study tours, and workshops.

U.S. -China Fact Sheet on Shale Gas Initiative (PDF)

7.  Energy Cooperation Program

  • The program will leverage private sector resources for project development work in China across a broad array of clean energy projects, to the benefit of both nations.

ECP Press Release

U.S.-China Clean Energy Announcements


World Leaders Will Delay Deal on Climate Change at Copenhagen

Nov 17, 2009

U.S. President Barack Obama and other world leaders supported delaying a legally binding climate pact until 2010 or even later, but European negotiators said the move did not imply weaker action.  French Environment Minister Jean-Louis Borloo said it was clear the main obstacle was the United States’ slow progress in defining its own potential emissions cuts.

During a meeting in Singapore, the U.S. President supported a Danish plan to salvage something from the unchanged negotiations and technology transfer.  While this falls short of hopes that Copenhagen would lock in place a new action plan for the world, it recognizes the lack of progress in recent preparatory talks and the hold-ups of climate legislation in the U.S. Senate.

Danish Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen, the host and chairman of the climate talks, flew overnight to Singapore to pitch the deferral plan to 19 leaders, including Obama and Chinese president Hu Jintao, at an unscheduled event during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit.  He insisted that the Copenhagen talks could still set political targets and outline commitments.

The proposal by Denmark, the host and chair of the climate talks, would set the stage for a political accord at Copenhagen next month and the setting of a new deadline for countries to agree on targets, levels of funding and verification of commitments.  This would give breathing room for the U.S. senate to pass carbon-capping legislation allowing Obama administration to bring a 2020 target and financing pledges to the table at a UN climate meeting in Mexico or Germany in mid-2010.

It was unclear if China, the world’s biggest emitter, supported the delay but other leader said there was little choice.

The extension of the process is not unexpected, given the flurry of downbeat statements by world leaders in recent weeks.  It may avoid a total breakdown at Copenhagen, but the delay has frustrated those who feel time is running out to prevent calamitous levels of climate change.

World leaders back delay to final climate deal


National Grid Submits Proposal to Triple Energy Efficiency Programs

Nov 10, 2009

National Grid submitted a proposal to the Massachusetts Department of Public Utility Commission to expand its energy efficiency programs by a factor of three between 2010 and 2012.

The energy retailer says that its plan would reduce energy use 2 percent by 2012 and help customers save $2 billion over the life of energy efficiency measures that are implemented.  If National Grid has its way, Massachusetts electricity customers will pay higher electricity and gas rates while benefiting from expanded energy efficiency programs that help them use less energy overall.

To help customers achieve energy savings, National Grid wants to expand its electricity energy efficiency programs from the current $85 million to about $570 million in the three-year period between 2010 and 2012. Natural gas energy efficiency programs would go from $20 million now to nearly $200 million over those three years.

To support the programs, the typical residential customer using 500 kWh per month would see a $1.15 monthly increase, while natural gas customers using 82 therms a month would see a monthly hike of $3.25.

National Grid Submits Plan To DPU for Unprecedented Energy-Efficiency Program Expansion


Senate Pushing Climate Bill

Oct 23, 2009

As we move closer to the close of the Senate’s session this winter, the climate bill that has been much debated over is looking likely to come to vote.  All past bills addressing climate change and energy have met a filibuster in the Senate, thanks to the GOP.

Senator John Kerry (D. MA) and Senator Lindsay Graham (R. SC) wrote an op-ed article for the New York Times last week, coming together to say they would try to find compromise on several key areas, including nuclear power, offshore drilling and a border tax on items produced in countries that avoid high environmental standards.

“Failure to act comes with another cost. If Congress does not pass legislation dealing with climate change, the administration will use the Environmental Protection Agency to impose new regulations. Imposed regulations are likely to be tougher and they certainly will not include the job protections and investment incentives we are proposing.

The message to those who have stalled for years is clear: killing a Senate bill is not success; indeed, given the threat of agency regulation, those who have been content to make the legislative process grind to a halt would later come running to Congress in a panic to secure the kinds of incentives and investments we can pass today. Industry needs the certainty that comes with Congressional action.

We are confident that a legitimate bipartisan effort can put America back in the lead again and can empower our negotiators to sit down at the table in Copenhagen in December and insist that the rest of the world join us in producing a new international agreement on global warming. That way, we will pass on to future generations a strong economy, a clean environment and an energy-independent nation.”

There is still a lot of work ahead to reach the magic number of 60 votes to prevent the filibuster, before this winters vote. For starters, the bill’s lead sponsors, Senators. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), can safely rely on 31 “yes” votes as they work on building their coalition.

Here is the 31 “Yeses” list:

  1. Daniel Akaka (Hawaii)
  2. Barbara Boxer (Calif.)
  3. Ben Cardin (Md.)
  4. Tom Carper (Del.)
  5. Chris Dodd (Conn.)
  6. Dick Durbin (Ill.)
  7. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.)
  8. Tom Harkin (Iowa)
  9. Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.)
  10. Daniel Inouye (Hawaii)
  11. Ted Kaufman (Del.)
  12. John Kerry (Mass.)
  13. Paul Kirk (Mass.)
  14. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.)
  15. Herbert Kohl (Wis.)
  16. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.)
  17. Patrick Leahy (Vt.)
  18. Joe Lieberman (Conn.)
  19. Robert Menendez (N.J.)
  20. Jeff Merkley (Ore.)
  21. Barbara Mikulski (Md.)
  22. Patty Murray (Wash.)
  23. Jack Reed (R.I.)
  24. Harry Reid (Nev.)
  25. Bernie Sanders (Vt.)
  26. Charles Schumer (N.Y.)
  27. Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.)
  28. Mark Udall (Colo.)
  29. Tom Udall (N.M.)
  30. Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.)
  31. Ron Wyden (Ore.)

Another 12 senators fall into the “probably yes” camp, from Michael Bennet of Colorado to Al Franken of Minnesota and Mark Warner of Virginia. Bennet and Warner are not slam dunks given the fossil fuel interests in their home states, while Franken dropped off the “yes” list when he signed a letter with nine other Democrats in August that raised concerns about President Obama’s stance against trade sanctions on carbon-intensive goods from developing countries that do not have strong enough climate policies.

The 12 “Probables” are:

  1. Roland Burris (Ill.)
  2. Michael Bennet (Colo.)
  3. Jeff Bingaman (N.M.)
  4. Robert Casey (Pa.)
  5. Susan Collins (Maine)
  6. Russ Feingold (Wis.)
  7. Al Franken (Minn.)
  8. Kay Hagan (N.C.)
  9. Tim Johnson (S.D.)
  10. Bill Nelson (Fla.)
  11. Olympia Snowe (Maine)
  12. Mark Warner (Va.)

As for the fence sitters, the list continues to swell from both directions as key senators hedge their bets.

We may get only 56 or 57 Democratic votes for cloture — and thus may need at least 4 and preferably 5 or more GOP’ers, which I think is now in sight.  The bill is not a sure thing, but it is likely, especially since Obama is ramping up his push.  More on that later.

The 24 “Fence-Sitters” are:

  1. Max Baucus (Mont.)
  2. Evan Bayh (Ind.)
  3. Mark Begich (Alaska)
  4. Sherrod Brown (Ohio)
  5. Robert Byrd (W.Va.)
  6. Maria Cantwell (Wash.)
  7. Kent Conrad (N.D.)
  8. Byron Dorgan (N.D.)
  9. Lindsey Graham (S.C.)
  10. Judd Gregg (N.H.)
  11. George LeMieux (Fla.)
  12. Carl Levin (Mich.)
  13. Blanche Lincoln (Ark.)
  14. Richard Lugar (Ind.)
  15. John McCain (Ariz.)
  16. Claire McCaskill (Mo.)
  17. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)
  18. Mark Pryor (Ark.)
  19. Jay Rockefeller (W.Va.)
  20. Arlen Specter (Pa.)
  21. Debbie Stabenow (Mich.)
  22. Jon Tester (Mont.)
  23. George Voinovich (Ohio)
  24. Jim Webb (Va.)

At least 67 Senators are in play

Here is that list:

  1. Daniel Akaka (Hawaii)
  2. Barbara Boxer (Calif.)
  3. Ben Cardin (Md.)
  4. Tom Carper (Del.)
  5. Chris Dodd (Conn.)
  6. Dick Durbin (Ill.)
  7. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.)
  8. Tom Harkin (Iowa)
  9. Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.)
  10. Daniel Inouye (Hawaii)
  11. Ted Kaufman (Del.)
  12. John Kerry (Mass.)
  13. Paul Kirk (Mass.)
  14. Amy Klobuchar (Minn.)
  15. Herbert Kohl (Wis.)
  16. Frank Lautenberg (N.J.)
  17. Patrick Leahy (Vt.)
  18. Joe Lieberman (Conn.)
  19. Robert Menendez (N.J.)
  20. Jeff Merkley (Ore.)
  21. Barbara Mikulski (Md.)
  22. Patty Murray (Wash.)
  23. Jack Reed (R.I.)
  24. Harry Reid (Nev.)
  25. Bernie Sanders (Vt.)
  26. Charles Schumer (N.Y.)
  27. Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.)
  28. Mark Udall (Colo.)
  29. Tom Udall (N.M.)
  30. Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.)
  31. Ron Wyden (Ore.)

Then we have the 12 probables:

Another 12 senators fall into the “probably yes” camp, from Michael Bennet of Colorado to Al Franken of Minnesota and Mark Warner of Virginia. Bennet and Warner are not slam dunks given the fossil fuel interests in their home states, while Franken dropped off the “yes” list when he signed a letter with nine other Democrats in August that raised concerns about President Obama’s stance against trade sanctions on carbon-intensive goods from developing countries that do not have strong enough climate policies

  1. Roland Burris (Ill.)
  2. Michael Bennet (Colo.)
  3. Jeff Bingaman (N.M.)
  4. Robert Casey (Pa.)
  5. Susan Collins (Maine)
  6. Russ Feingold (Wis.)
  7. Al Franken (Minn.)
  8. Kay Hagan (N.C.)
  9. Tim Johnson (S.D.)
  10. Bill Nelson (Fla.)
  11. Olympia Snowe (Maine)
  12. Mark Warner (Va.)

Finally we have the 24 fence sitters:

As for the fence sitters, the list continues to swell from both directions as key senators hedge their bets.

For example, Sens. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) no longer reside in the “probably yes” camp given their recent statements on allocations and oversight of the carbon markets, respectively. Baucus may drive the hardest bargain as chairman of the Finance Committee, where he is sure to negotiate on behalf of coal-state Democrats who think the House-passed bill unfairly favors electric utilities that service the East and West coasts.

Two senators have recently been upgraded to the fence from the “probably no” camp are Sens. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) and George Voinovich (R-Ohio). Byrd has long questioned action to curb emissions but has taken a lead role on carbon sequestration language that Kerry and Boxer are trying to wrap into their proposal. Voinovich has a reputation for bipartisan consensus building, and recent signals supporting the nuclear power industry are raising hopes in some sectors that the retiring senator should still be considered in play.

“If you engage in a very proactive way to get a bill done, he will negotiate and compromise,” said a former Senate Republican aide.

E&E’s analysis is based on interviews with senators, plus dozens of Democratic and Republican sources, industry and environmental groups….

GOP interest is significant for the climate bill’s overall prospects given that Democrats are unlikely to carry all 60 of their own votes on the floor.

In all, E&E now lists eight Republicans as “fence sitters” on the climate bill, with the two from Maine — Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe — holding firm as “probably yes” votes given their past efforts on the issue. Collins and Snowe are likely to compensate for the loss of Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Ben Nelson of Nebraska, the only Democrats listed among 11 “probably no” votes given their many comments questioning the environmental agenda of the Obama administration and Senate leaders.

Elsewhere, sponsors got their biggest boost when Kerry went public with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on a partnership that they had been quietly working on since the summer. The senators pledged in an Oct. 11 New York Times op-ed that they would try to find compromise on several key areas, including nuclear power, offshore drilling and a border tax on items produced in countries that avoid high environmental standards.

“I can see a way to get to 60 votes, and so can he, if we pull the right folks to the table and do this in the right way,” Kerry said last week. “And that’s what we’re going to do.”

There are also a lot of fence-sitting Dems:

Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio, for example, is crafting language to help manufacturers.

From July:  Sherrod Brown (D-OH) says he won’t filibuster climate bill

Michigan’s Debbie Stabenow hopes to release long-awaited agriculture ideas. And Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania will be forced to take a stand as early as next month when Boxer’s Environment and Public Works Committee holds a markup on its bill.

Other influential Democratic fence sitters include Michigan Sen. Carl Levin, who said last week that he expects to push at least four issues once the bill nears the floor.

Levin said he will be seeking a national greenhouse gas emission standard and repeal of state-specific standards. Like Franken, he said a border tax adjustment needs to be part of the bill. And Levin said he wants a “fail-safe provision in case the technologies don’t advance as quickly as some people think they will.”

“And you’ve got to fairly proportion the burden,” Levin added.

Agriculture Chairwoman Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) also remains on the fence. The two-term senator said last week that she wants to get a better grip on the effect that a climate bill would have on farmers and in the cost of food to consumers.

“I don’t disagree with the objective, and I hope we’ll stay focused on the objective, which is to lower our greenhouse gases and emissions and our carbon output,” Lincoln said.

Lincoln in past years has cosponsored efforts to address the cost fluctuations in climate legislation. Environmental groups are banking on her and Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) as key votes that get them to across the 60-vote threshold.

But an industry source tracking the climate debate doubts that Lincoln can sign off on climate legislation as she heads into a heated re-election battle next November. “No amount of National Wildlife Federation polling is going to help her in the delta,” the source said. “She has an issue.”

Election-year politics also may influence several other Democrats. Specter faces a primary challenge from his left in Rep. Joe Sestak, a campaign that has put an even larger spotlight on his vote.

From August:  Arlen Specter: “No doubt about” voting for cloture on the climate bill

Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) faces the same unemployment concerns as Lugar but with the added pressure of a 2010 re-election campaign. So far, Bayh has not drawn a significant challenger and political analyst Charlie Cook ranked the race earlier this month as “solid D” for the incumbent. But political observers still see Bayh as vulnerable to home-state concerns.

Other Democrats on the fence include a number of senators representing either coal-consuming or coal-producing states, including Claire McCaskill of Missouri, North Dakota Sens. Kent Conrad and Byron Dorgan, Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, Jon Tester of Montana and Jim Webb of Virginia. Conrad and Dorgan may be among the most difficult fence sitters to win over. Both have insisted for months that Senate leaders should start with energy-only legislation and save the big climate change measure for later.

Beyond Nelson and Landrieu (who are listed correctly as probable no votes), Lincoln and Dorgan will be the hardest to get, I’m told.

We may get only 56 or 57 Democratic votes for cloture — and thus may need at least 4 and preferably 5 or more GOP’ers, which I think is now in sight.  The bill is not a sure thing, but it is likely, especially since Obama is ramping up his push.  More on that later.

Here is the full list of 24 on the fence:

  1. Max Baucus (Mont.)
  2. Evan Bayh (Ind.)
  3. Mark Begich (Alaska)
  4. Sherrod Brown (Ohio)
  5. Robert Byrd (W.Va.)
  6. Maria Cantwell (Wash.)
  7. Kent Conrad (N.D.)
  8. Byron Dorgan (N.D.)
  9. Lindsey Graham (S.C.)
  10. Judd Gregg (N.H.)
  11. George LeMieux (Fla.)
  12. Carl Levin (Mich.)
  13. Blanche Lincoln (Ark.)
  14. Richard Lugar (Ind.)
  15. John McCain (Ariz.)
  16. Claire McCaskill (Mo.)
  17. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)
  18. Mark Pryor (Ark.)
  19. Jay Rockefeller (W.Va.)
  20. Arlen Specter (Pa.)
  21. Debbie Stabenow (Mich.)
  22. Jon Tester (Mont.)
  23. George Voinovich (Ohio)
  24. Jim Webb (Va.)

Those are the ones to focus attention on, especially Dorgan, Gregg, LeMieux, Lincoln, Lugar, McCain, Murkowski, and Voinovich.  Getting at least 2 of those and preferably 3 or more would probably give us the bill.

Share

Print Print


This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 21st, 2009 at 2:04 pm and is filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

6 Responses to “E&E News: “At least 67 senators are in play” on climate bill; Murkowski open to voting for “cap and trade””

  1. RunawayRose says:

    Iowa’s got one safe “Yes” (Harkin) and one safe “No” (Grassley). I will write them again about it, especially Grassley, but I don’t know if there’s anything useful I can do about the fence-sitters.

  2. ecostew says:

    Senate receives letter from scientific organizations:
    http://www.aaas.org/ news/ releases/ 2009/ media/ 1021climate_letter.pdf

  3. PinkmiNi15 says:

    I wonder why Rollie Burris isn’t in the “full support” camp?

    My sense is that he basically does what the leadership tells him. Plus, his old patron, Rod Blagojevich, was actually pretty progressive on the climate issue.

  4. Bill R says:

    I know you generally support the Waxman/Markey and Kerry/Boxer bills Joe, but in researching why my D Sentator Maria Cantwell is a fence sitter on this bill I ran across the fact that she has an alternate bill (will few backers and which has not passed a vote). Nonetheless, I like it’s mechanism of auctioning permits on the fossil fuel itself rather than the emissions.

    In searching your blog I am a little disappointed you have not discussed in detail the pluses and minuses of her proposal. Or have you and can you provide a link?

    Thanks….

  5. Mike D says:

    Burris has finally realized that he has absolutely nothing to lose and is starting to throw some weight around, especially on healthcare.

  6. Those 67 votes could be the ones that one day ratify an international agreement to reduce emissions.

Leave a Reply



Executive Order Firmly Commits Federal Agencies to Sustainability

Oct 09, 2009

Earlier this week, President Obama issued Executive Order 13514, which lays out significant green goals for the U.S. government.  In the next 90 days, all federal agencies must set emissions reduction goals for 2020.

The impact of the order promises to be huge, considering the federal government’s sheer size: it occupies nearly 500,000 buildings and operates more than 600,000 vehicles.

The new executive order signed by the president, mandates agencies across the federal government to “measure, manage, and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions toward agency defined targets,” the White House said in a statement.

“The federal government can and should lead by example when it comes to creating innovative ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase energy efficiency, conserve water, reduce waste, and use environmentally-responsible products and technologies,” Obama said in a statement.

Another key component of the Executive Order, is a green procurement policy to cover 95% of new contracts and acquisitions.  With the governments huge buying power, which exceeds more than a half trillion dollars spent on goods and services annually, they will carry a lot of weight.

Obama’s order lays out a handful of additional requirements, designed to save costs and cut waste in the government.   The list includes low-hanging fruit targeted at green IT, and the encourages staff to look at alternatives to traditional commuting and business travel.

  1. Procurement preference for EPEAT (registered electronic products)
  2. Implementing power management, energy-efficient or environmentally preferable features on all eligible agency electronic products
  3. Employing environmentally sound practices with disposition of all agency electronics
  4. Procurement of Energy Star and FEMP designated electronic equipment
  5. Implementing best management practices for energy-efficient management of servers and Federal data centers
  6. Pursuing costs effective, innovative strategies, such as vegetated roofs, to minimize consumption of energy, water, and materials.
  7. Managing existing buildings systems to reduce the consumption of energy, water and materials, and identifying alternatives to renovation
  8. Identifying opportunities to consolidate and dispose of existing assets, optimize real-property portfolio, and reduce associated environmental impacts
  9. Ensuring the rehabilitation of federally owned historic buildings utilizes best practices and technologies in retrofitting to promote long-term viability

The most significant downstream effect, will be the bringing sustainability thinking to 1.8 million government workers’ daily lives.  Obama’s executive order will hopefully spread the green message far beyond Washington D.C. and into American’s daily lives.

Executive Order


Clean Technology Venture Capital Investment in 3Q Totals $1.59 Billion

Oct 06, 2009

The Cleantech Group along with Deloitte, two clean tech companies , today released preliminary 3Q 2009 results for clean technology venture investments in North America, Europe, China, and India totaling $1.59 billion across 134 companies.

That means total clean tech venture capital funding this year is already about $3.8 billion – which puts total funding on pace to exceed every year except 2008.

Dallas Kachan, Managing Director, at Cleantech Group, said, “The billions in government funding being allocated globally in clean technology have begun emboldening private capital, which has in turn helped propel clean technology to the leading venture investment sector, now eclipsing bio tech and IT.”

“The extension of tax credits for renewable-based power generation along with government stimulus and regulatory requirements to meet renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are helping to drive continued investment on the part of venture capitalist and utilities into the clean tech sector,” said Scott Smith, U.S. leader of Deloitte’s Clean Tech practices.  “Utilities are increasingly bringing their access to capital to the sector through direct investment and power purchase agreements, driving new projects and increased capacity.  We continue to see utilities investing in wind and solar and expect this trend to continue as clean tech projects become more economically viable and desirable for utilities.”

The leading clean technology investment sector was solar, which rose from the previous quarter’s 12% to 28% of venture investment, but still only received $451 million, down from a high of $1.2 billion invested in 3Q 2008.  “Solar thermal was the leading energy source procured through power purchase agreements in the first half of 2009,” said Scott Smith, U.S. leader of Deloitte’s  clean tech practice.

Green buildings-including energy efficient buildings.glass and lighting sub sectors, had a strong quarter also, with investment of $1110 million.

In the leading clean tech IPO of the quarter, and one of the most significant clean tech exits to date, A 123 Systems made its long awaited debut on the NASDAQ Global Market, in which the company raised #380 million at a company valuation of $1.3 billion (which rose to$1.9 billion by the close of day one trading).  Other clean technology IPOs recorded in 3Q 2009 were wind farm developer Indian Energy, which began trading on London’s AIM, raising $16.2 million, and India-based Euro Multivision which raised $13.5 million on the Bombay Stock Exchange for the company’s photovoltaic solar cell manufacturing unit.

North America accounted for 67% of the total venture capital funding, raising USD $1.1 billion, up 8% form 2Q 2009.  The region accounted for the four largest venture capital deals (Solyndra, Tesla Motors, SolFocus, and Serious Materials) as well as the largest IPO (A123Systems).  California led the way with $655 million in investment, followed by Colorado with $47 million.

Clean technology venture investment continued recovering in 3Q09 spurred by economic stimulus investment


New EPA Rule to Require the Use of Best Technologies

Oct 01, 2009

Appearing at a climate summit in Los Angles, CA today Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson will announce the administration’s plan to regulate industrial global warming pollution, with or without the support of Congress.  In May, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed global warming standards for motor vehicles, applauded by the auto industry.  Under the rules of the Clean Air Act, when these regulations go into effect in March 2010, all major greenhouse gas polluters – from coal-fired power plants and oil refiners to methane-emitting landfills – are automatically subject to regulation.

Today’s announcement by the EPA comes hours after the introduction of legislation to limit global warming pollution by Sen. Jon Kerry (D-MA_ and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) this morning, two-and-a-half years after the U.S. Supreme Court mandated action on global warming pollution, and 17 years after the United States ratified the Rio de Janeiro climate treaty, pledging to “prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.”

New EPA rule will require use of best technologies to reduce greenhouse gases from large facilities/small businesses and farms exempt


Newsweek’s New Green Rankings

Sep 24, 2009

This past Monday, Newsweek published their first annual Green Rankings.  Unlike many other corporate environmental rankings that are abounding in the marketplace, Newsweek has managed to compile, rate, and rank the environmental pperformance, achievements, and reputation of the 500 largest publicly held companies that trade on either the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or NASDAQ (the two largest American stock markets).

Joel Makower, in his article “Inside Newsweek’s Green Corporate Rankings”, said that, “It may well be the best effort yet to rigorously and comprehensively assess the mainstream corporate marketplace – at least in the U.S.”

The Newsweek rankings assess the S&P 500 on three metrics:

  • An “Environmental Impact Score”: based on more than 700 metrics (45%)
    • Company emissions
    • Natural resource use
    • Waste disposal
  • A “Green Policies Score”: an analysis of corporate policies and initiatives (45%)
    • Climate change policies and performance
    • Pollution policies and performance
    • Product impacts
    • Environmental stewardship and management
  • A “Reputation Survey Score”: resulting from a survey of CEOs, corporate environmental officers, and academics (10%)
    • The survey asked respondents to rate companies as “leaders” or “laggards in five key “green areas”.
      • Green performance
      • Commitment
      • Communication
      • Track record
      • Ambassadors

Top 10 Ranked Companies

  1. Hewlett Packard
  2. Dell
  3. Johnson & Johnson
  4. Intel
  5. IBM
  6. State Street
  7. Nike
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  9. Applied Materials
  10. Starbucks

While this cross-industry ranking of environmental performance, policy and reputation may be imperfect, as all of its peers are, it will undoubtedly add to the corporate race towards improved environmental sustainability.

Inside Newsweek’s new green corporate rankings


Federal Court Says States May Sue Utilities Over GHGs

Sep 22, 2009

A federal appeals court ruled Monday that states trying to combat global warming can sue six electric utilities to force them to cut the greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted by their power plants in 20 states.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan reinstated the lawsuits after a lower court judge tossed out the actions brought in 2004 by eight states, New York City and three land trusts.  The lawsuits had accuse the companies of being among the largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the world and sought to force them to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions.

The appeals court said the lower court judge erred in ruling that the issue was a political one that was not meant to be decided by the courts.  The court said that not every case with political overtones has to be kept out of the courts.

“It is error to equate a political question with a political case,” the court wrote. “Given the checks and balances among the three branches of our government, the judiciary can no more usurp executive and legislative prerogatives than it can decline to decide matters within its jurisdiction simply because such matters may have political ramifications.”

The appeals court noted that the legislative branch was free to amend the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, and the executive branch can regulate emissions through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The states bringing the lawsuit are California, Connecticut, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin.  New York City and three nonprofit land trusts also are part of the litigation.

U.S. courts reinstates emissions suite vs. utilities

David Hawkins, director of the National Resource Defense Council’s climate programs, said “The import of this ruling is that failure of Congress or EPA to act on GHG will not immunize emitters from legal action to compel reductions in emissions.”