<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neuwing Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.neuwingenergy.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:34:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>DOE Announces More Funding From the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act</title>
		<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/doe-announces-american-reinvestment-and-recovery-act-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/doe-announces-american-reinvestment-and-recovery-act-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuwingenergy.com/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Energy Secretary, Steven Chu announced more awards from the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act for funding from the Department of Energy.

Clemson University will receive up to $45 million for a wind energy test facility that will enhance the performance, durability, and reliability of utility-scale wind turbines.  The Large Wind Turbine Drivetrain Testing facility [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Energy Secretary, Steven Chu announced more awards from the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act for funding from the Department of Energy.</p>
<ul>
<li>Clemson University will receive up to $45 million for a wind energy test facility that will enhance the performance, durability, and reliability of utility-scale wind turbines.  The Large Wind Turbine Drivetrain Testing facility will enable the U.S., which leads the world in wind energy capacity, to expand development and testing of large-scale wind turbine drive-train systems domestically.  The new facility will be located at the Charleston Naval Complex, a former Navy base in North Charleston, S.C. and will be a part of the Clemson University Restoration Institute campus.  The test facility will operate as a non-profit organization with a business model designed for sustainability while providing ongoing state-of-the-art testing to wind turbine manufacturers. These tests of drivetrains are required to demonstrate compliance with wind turbine design standards, reduce wind turbine costs, secure product financing, and reduce the technical and financial risk of deploying mass-produced wind turbine models.  <a title="Secretary Chu Announces $45 Million to Support Next Generation of Wind Turbine Designs" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/8303.htm" target="_blank">Press Release</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Small businesses will have $18 million invested to support innovation research, development and deployment of clean energy technologies.  In this first phase of funding, 125 grants of up to $150,000 each will be awarded to 107 small advanced technology firms across the U.S.  The companies were competitively selected from a pool of 950 applicants through a special fast-track process with an emphasis on near-term commercialization and job creation. Companies that demonstrate successful results with their new technologies and show potential to meet market needs will be eligible for $60 million in a second round of grants in the summer of 2010.  Grants were awarded in each of the following ten topic areas:  <a title="DOE to Invest $18 Million in Small Business Clean Energy Innovation Projects" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/8300.htm" target="_blank">Press Release</a>
<ol>
<li>Advanced Building Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Thermal Load Shifting, and Cool Roofs (15 projects, for up to $2,241,229 total)</li>
<li>Water Usage in Electric Power Production (6 projects, for up to $878,144)</li>
<li>Power Plant Cooling (1 project, $150,000)</li>
<li>Advanced Gas Turbines and Materials (11 projects, for up to $1,637,033)</li>
<li>Sensors, Controls, and Wireless Networks (12 projects, for up to $1,787,061)</li>
<li>Advanced Water Power Technology Development (12 projects, for up to $1,747,259)</li>
<li>Smart Controllers for Smart Grid Applications (8 projects, for up to $1,166,871)</li>
<li>Advanced Solar Technologies (12 projects, for up to $2,783,996)</li>
<li>Advanced Industrial Technologies Development (25 projects, for up to $3,709,564)</li>
<li>Advanced Manufacturing Processes (16 projects, for up to $2,222,110)</li>
</ol>
<ul>
<li><a title="Small Business Investment" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/documents2009/SBIR_Awards_112309.pdf" target="_blank">Full list of awards</a> (PDF)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Thirty-two demonstration projects, which include large-scale energy storage, smart meters, distribution and transmission system monitoring devices, and a range of other smart technologies, will act as models for deploying integrated Smart Grid systems on a broader scale. They were awarded $620 million for projects around the country to demonstrate advanced Smart Grid technologies and integrated systems that will help build a smarter, more efficient, more resilient electrical grid.  Applicants say this investment will create thousands of new job opportunities that will include manufacturing workers, engineers, electricians, equipment installers, IT system designers, cyber security specialists, and business and power system analysts.  <a title="Secretary Chu Announces $620 Million for Smart Grid Demonstration and Energy Storage Projects" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/8305.htm" target="_blank">Press Release</a>
<ul>
<li>In the first group, 16 awards totaling $435 million will support fully integrated, regional Smart Grid demonstrations in 21 states, representing over 50 utilities and electricity organizations with a combined customer base of almost 100 million consumers.</li>
<li>In the second group, an additional 16 awards for a total of $185 million will help fund utility-scale energy storage projects that will enhance the reliability and efficiency of the grid, while reducing the need for new electricity plants.</li>
<li><a title="Smart Grid Demo Project List" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/documents2009/SG_Demo_Project_List_11.24.09.pdf" target="_blank">Full list of selected projects</a> (PDF)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; top: 479px; width: 1px; height: 1px;"><strong>Advanced Water Power Technology Development (12 projects, for up to $1,747,259)</strong></div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9RJiElIhBz4&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9RJiElIhBz4&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/doe-announces-american-reinvestment-and-recovery-act-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. and China Establish Extensive Cooperation on Clean Energy</title>
		<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/u-s-and-china-establish-extensive-cooperation-on-clean-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/u-s-and-china-establish-extensive-cooperation-on-clean-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuwingenergy.com/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao have announced the creation of a joint program to develop clean energy, including the creation of a $150 million clean energy research center.  Earlier this week both attended the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit, where they agreed along with 19 other world leaders on a deferral plan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao have announced the creation of a joint program to develop clean energy, including the creation of a $150 million clean energy research center.  Earlier this week both attended the <a title="Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit" href="http://www.apec.org/" target="_blank">Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit</a>, where they agreed along with 19 other world leaders on a deferral plan for the upcoming climate talks at <a title="United Nations Climate Change Conference Dec 7 - Dec 18, 2009" href="http://en.cop15.dk/" target="_blank">Copenhagen</a>.  <a title="World Leaders Will Delay Deal on climate Change at Copenhagen" href="http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/world-leaders-will-delay-deal-on-climate-change-at-copenhagen/" target="_self">Read more&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Meeting in Beijing, the two presidents agreed to a seven-point plan designed to speed the development of renewable energy and improve energy efficiency.  The agreement includes the following initiatives:</p>
<p>1.  China Clean Energy Research Center</p>
<ul>
<li>The Center will facilitate joint research and development of clean energy technologies by teams of scientists and engineers from the United States and China, as well as serve as a clearinghouse to help researchers in each country.</li>
</ul>
<p><a title="U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Clean Energy Research Center" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/documents2009/U.S.-China_Fact_Sheet_CERC.pdf" target="_blank">U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Clean Energy Research</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>2.  China Electric Vehicles Initiatives</p>
<ul>
<li>Building on the first ever U.S.-China Electric Vehicle Forum in September 2009, the initiative will include joint standards development, demonstration projects in more than a dozen cities, technical road mapping and public education projects. <a title="U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Vehicles Initative" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/documents2009/US-China_Fact_Sheet_Electric_Vehicles.pdf" target="_blank"> </a></li>
</ul>
<p><a title="U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Vehicles Initative" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/documents2009/US-China_Fact_Sheet_Electric_Vehicles.pdf" target="_blank">U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Electric Vehicles Initiative</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>3.  Energy Efficiency Action Plan</p>
<ul>
<li>Under the new plan, the two countries will work together to improve the energy efficiency of buildings, industrial facilities, and consumer appliances.</li>
</ul>
<p><a title="U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Energy Efficiency Plan" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/documents2009/US-China_Fact_Sheet_Efficiency_Action_Plan.pdf" target="_blank">U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Energy Efficiency Plan</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>4.  Renewable Energy Partnership</p>
<ul>
<li>Under the partnership, the two countries will develop road maps for wide-spread renewable energy deployment in both countries.  The partnership will also provide technical and analytical resources to states and regions in both countries to support renewable energy deployment and will facilitate state-to-state and region-to-region partnerships to share experience and best practices.</li>
</ul>
<p><a title="U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Renewable Energy Partnership" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/documents2009/US-China_Fact_Sheet_Renewable_Energy.pdf" target="_blank">U.S.-China Fact Sheet on Renewable Energy Partnership</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>5.  21st Century Coal</p>
<ul>
<li>The two governments are actively engaging industry, academia, and civil society in advancing clean coal and carbon capture and storage (CSS) solutions.</li>
</ul>
<p><a title="U.S.-China Fact Sheet on 21st Century Coal" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/documents2009/US-China_Fact_Sheet_Coal.pdf" target="_blank">U.S.-China Fact Sheet on 21st Century Coal</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>6.  Shale Gas Initiative</p>
<ul>
<li>Under the Initiative, the U.S. and China will use experience gained in the United States to assess China&#8217;s shale gas potential, promote environmentally-sustainable development of shale gas resources, conduct joint technical studies to accelerate development of shale gas resources in China, and promote shale gas investment in China through <a title="U.S.-China Oil and Gas Industry Forum" href="http://www.uschinaogf.org/" target="_blank">U.S.-China Oil and Gas Industry Forum</a>, study tours, and workshops.</li>
</ul>
<p><a title="U.S. -China Fact Sheet on Shale Gas Initiative" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/documents2009/US-China_Fact_Sheet_Shale_Gas.pdf" target="_blank">U.S. -China Fact Sheet on Shale Gas Initiative</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>7.  Energy Cooperation Program</p>
<ul>
<li>The program will leverage private sector resources for project development work in China across a broad array of clean energy projects, to the benefit of both nations.</li>
</ul>
<p><a title="Peabody Energy Becomes Founding Member of Energy Cooperation Program Between China and the United States" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS96160+29-Oct-2009+PRN20091029" target="_blank">ECP Press Release</a></p>
<p><a title="U.S. Department of Energy - U.S.-China Clean Energy Announcements" href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/8292.htm" target="_blank">U.S.-China Clean Energy Announcements</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/u-s-and-china-establish-extensive-cooperation-on-clean-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Leaders Will Delay Deal on Climate Change at Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/world-leaders-will-delay-deal-on-climate-change-at-copenhagen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/world-leaders-will-delay-deal-on-climate-change-at-copenhagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuwingenergy.com/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. President Barack Obama and other world leaders supported delaying a legally binding climate pact until 2010 or even later, but European negotiators said the move did not imply weaker action.  French Environment Minister Jean-Louis Borloo said it was clear the main obstacle was the United States&#8217; slow progress in defining its own potential emissions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. President Barack Obama and other world leaders supported delaying a legally binding climate pact until 2010 or even later, but European negotiators said the move did not imply weaker action.  French Environment Minister Jean-Louis Borloo said it was clear the main obstacle was the United States&#8217; slow progress in defining its own potential emissions cuts.</p>
<p>During a meeting in Singapore, the U.S. President supported a Danish plan to salvage something from the unchanged negotiations and technology transfer.  While this falls short of hopes that <a title="United Nations Climate Change Conference Dec 7 - Dec 18, 2009" href="http://en.cop15.dk/" target="_blank">Copenhagen</a> would lock in place a new action plan for the world, it recognizes the lack of progress in recent preparatory talks and the hold-ups of climate legislation in the U.S. Senate.</p>
<p>Danish Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen, the host and chairman of the climate talks, flew overnight to Singapore to pitch the deferral plan to 19 leaders, including Obama and Chinese president Hu Jintao, at an unscheduled event during the <a title="Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit" href="http://www.apec.org/" target="_blank">Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit</a>.  He insisted that the Copenhagen talks could still set political targets and outline commitments.</p>
<p>The proposal by Denmark, the host and chair of the climate talks, would set the stage for a political accord at Copenhagen next month and the setting of a new deadline for countries to agree on targets, levels of funding and verification of commitments.  This would give breathing room for the U.S. senate to pass carbon-capping legislation allowing Obama administration to bring a 2020 target and financing pledges to the table at a UN climate meeting in Mexico or Germany in mid-2010.</p>
<p>It was unclear if China, the world&#8217;s biggest emitter, supported the delay but other leader said there was little choice.</p>
<p>The extension of the process is not unexpected, given the flurry of downbeat statements by world leaders in recent weeks.  It may avoid a total breakdown at Copenhagen, but the delay has frustrated those who feel time is running out to prevent calamitous levels of climate change.</p>
<p><a title="World Leaders Will Delay Deal on Climate Change at Copenhagen" href="http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFTRE5AE0FP20091115?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0" target="_blank">World leaders back delay to final climate deal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/world-leaders-will-delay-deal-on-climate-change-at-copenhagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Grid Submits Proposal to Triple Energy Efficiency Programs</title>
		<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/national-grid-submits-proposal-to-triple-energy-efficiency-programs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/national-grid-submits-proposal-to-triple-energy-efficiency-programs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuwingenergy.com/?p=870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Grid submitted a proposal to the Massachusetts Department of Public Utility Commission to expand its energy efficiency programs by a factor of three between 2010 and 2012.
The energy retailer says that its plan would reduce energy use 2 percent by 2012 and help customers save $2 billion over the life of energy efficiency measures [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Grid submitted a proposal to the Massachusetts Department of Public Utility Commission to expand its energy efficiency programs by a factor of three between 2010 and 2012.</p>
<p>The energy retailer says that its plan would reduce energy use 2 percent by 2012 and help customers save $2 billion over the life of energy efficiency measures that are implemented.  If National Grid has its way, Massachusetts electricity customers will pay higher electricity and gas rates while benefiting from expanded energy efficiency programs that help them use less energy overall.</p>
<p>To help customers achieve energy savings, National Grid wants to expand its electricity energy efficiency programs from the current $85 million to about $570 million in the three-year period between 2010 and 2012. Natural gas energy efficiency programs would go from $20 million now to nearly $200 million over those three years.</p>
<p>To support the programs, the typical residential customer using 500 kWh per month would see a $1.15 monthly increase, while natural gas customers using 82 therms a month would see a monthly hike of $3.25.</p>
<p><a title="National Grid Submits Plan to DPU for Unprecedented Energy-Efficiency Program Expansion" href="http://www.nationalgridus.com/aboutus/a3-1_news2.asp?document=4594" target="_blank">National Grid Submits Plan To DPU for Unprecedented Energy-Efficiency Program Expansion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/national-grid-submits-proposal-to-triple-energy-efficiency-programs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Pushing Climate Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/senate-pushing-climate-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/senate-pushing-climate-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuwingenergy.com/?p=868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we move closer to the close of the Senate&#8217;s session this winter, the climate bill that has been much debated over is looking likely to come to vote.  All past bills addressing climate change and energy have met a filibuster in the Senate, thanks to the GOP.
Senator John Kerry (D. MA) and Senator Lindsay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we move closer to the close of the Senate&#8217;s session this winter, the climate bill that has been much debated over is looking likely to come to vote.  All past bills addressing climate change and energy have met a filibuster in the Senate, thanks to the GOP.</p>
<p>Senator John Kerry (D. MA) and Senator Lindsay Graham (R. SC) wrote an op-ed article for the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/11/opinion/11kerrygraham.html?_r=1" target="_blank">New York Times</a> last week, coming together to say they would try to find compromise on several key areas, including nuclear power, offshore drilling and a border tax on items produced in countries that avoid high environmental standards.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;Failure to act comes with another cost. If Congress does not pass legislation dealing with climate change, the administration will use the Environmental Protection Agency to impose new regulations. Imposed regulations are likely to be tougher and they certainly will not include the job protections and investment incentives we are proposing.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The message to those who have stalled for years is clear: killing a Senate bill is not success; indeed, given the threat of agency regulation, those who have been content to make the legislative process grind to a halt would later come running to Congress in a panic to secure the kinds of incentives and investments we can pass today. Industry needs the certainty that comes with Congressional action.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">We are confident that a legitimate bipartisan effort can put America back in the lead again and can empower our negotiators to sit down at the table in Copenhagen in December and insist that the rest of the world join us in producing a new international agreement on global warming. That way, we will pass on to future generations a strong economy, a clean environment and an energy-independent nation.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is still a lot of work ahead to reach the magic number of 60 votes to prevent the filibuster, before this winters vote. For starters, the bill’s lead sponsors, Senators. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), can safely rely on 31 “yes” votes as they work on building their coalition.</p>
<p>Here is the 31 &#8220;Yeses&#8221; list:</p>
<ol>
<li>Daniel Akaka (Hawaii)</li>
<li>Barbara Boxer (Calif.)</li>
<li>Ben Cardin (Md.)</li>
<li>Tom Carper (Del.)</li>
<li>Chris Dodd (Conn.)</li>
<li>Dick Durbin (Ill.)</li>
<li>Dianne Feinstein (Calif.)</li>
<li>Tom Harkin (Iowa)</li>
<li>Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.)</li>
<li>Daniel Inouye (Hawaii)</li>
<li>Ted Kaufman (Del.)</li>
<li>John Kerry (Mass.)</li>
<li>Paul Kirk (Mass.)</li>
<li>Amy Klobuchar (Minn.)</li>
<li>Herbert Kohl (Wis.)</li>
<li>Frank Lautenberg (N.J.)</li>
<li>Patrick Leahy (Vt.)</li>
<li>Joe Lieberman (Conn.)</li>
<li>Robert Menendez (N.J.)</li>
<li>Jeff Merkley (Ore.)</li>
<li>Barbara Mikulski (Md.)</li>
<li>Patty Murray (Wash.)</li>
<li>Jack Reed (R.I.)</li>
<li>Harry Reid (Nev.)</li>
<li>Bernie Sanders (Vt.)</li>
<li>Charles Schumer (N.Y.)</li>
<li>Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.)</li>
<li>Mark Udall (Colo.)</li>
<li>Tom Udall (N.M.)</li>
<li>Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.)</li>
<li>Ron Wyden (Ore.)</li>
</ol>
<p>Another 12 senators fall into the “probably yes” camp, from Michael Bennet of Colorado to Al Franken of Minnesota and Mark Warner of Virginia. Bennet and Warner are not slam dunks given the fossil fuel interests in their home states, while Franken dropped off the “yes” list when he signed a letter with nine other Democrats in August that raised concerns about President Obama’s stance against trade sanctions on carbon-intensive goods from developing countries that do not have strong enough climate policies.</p>
<p>The 12 &#8220;Probables&#8221; are:</p>
<ol>
<li>Roland Burris (Ill.)</li>
<li> Michael Bennet (Colo.)</li>
<li> Jeff Bingaman (N.M.)</li>
<li> Robert Casey (Pa.)</li>
<li> Susan Collins (Maine)</li>
<li> Russ Feingold (Wis.)</li>
<li> Al Franken (Minn.)</li>
<li> Kay Hagan (N.C.)</li>
<li> Tim Johnson (S.D.)</li>
<li> Bill Nelson (Fla.)</li>
<li> Olympia Snowe (Maine)</li>
<li>Mark Warner (Va.)</li>
</ol>
<p>As for the fence sitters, the list continues to swell from both directions as key senators hedge their bets.</p>
<p>We may get only 56 or 57 Democratic votes for cloture — and thus may need at least 4 and preferably 5 or more GOP’ers, which I think is now in sight.  The bill is not a sure thing, but it is likely, especially since Obama is ramping up his push.  More on that later.</p>
<p>The 24 &#8220;Fence-Sitters&#8221; are:</p>
<ol>
<li>Max Baucus (Mont.)</li>
<li>Evan Bayh (Ind.)</li>
<li>Mark Begich (Alaska)</li>
<li>Sherrod Brown (Ohio)</li>
<li>Robert Byrd (W.Va.)</li>
<li>Maria Cantwell (Wash.)</li>
<li>Kent Conrad (N.D.)</li>
<li>Byron Dorgan (N.D.)</li>
<li>Lindsey Graham (S.C.)</li>
<li>Judd Gregg (N.H.)</li>
<li>George LeMieux (Fla.)</li>
<li>Carl Levin (Mich.)</li>
<li>Blanche Lincoln (Ark.)</li>
<li>Richard Lugar (Ind.)</li>
<li>John McCain (Ariz.)</li>
<li>Claire McCaskill (Mo.)</li>
<li>Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)</li>
<li>Mark Pryor (Ark.)</li>
<li>Jay Rockefeller (W.Va.)</li>
<li>Arlen Specter (Pa.)</li>
<li>Debbie Stabenow (Mich.)</li>
<li>Jon Tester (Mont.)</li>
<li>George Voinovich (Ohio)</li>
<li>Jim Webb (Va.)</li>
</ol>
<p><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/" target="_blank">At least 67 Senators are in play</a></p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 464px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">
<p>Here is that list:</p>
<ol>
<li>Daniel Akaka (Hawaii)</li>
<li>Barbara Boxer (Calif.)</li>
<li>Ben Cardin (Md.)</li>
<li>Tom Carper (Del.)</li>
<li>Chris Dodd (Conn.)</li>
<li>Dick Durbin (Ill.)</li>
<li>Dianne Feinstein (Calif.)</li>
<li>Tom Harkin (Iowa)</li>
<li>Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.)</li>
<li>Daniel Inouye (Hawaii)</li>
<li>Ted Kaufman (Del.)</li>
<li>John Kerry (Mass.)</li>
<li>Paul Kirk (Mass.)</li>
<li>Amy Klobuchar (Minn.)</li>
<li>Herbert Kohl (Wis.)</li>
<li>Frank Lautenberg (N.J.)</li>
<li>Patrick Leahy (Vt.)</li>
<li>Joe Lieberman (Conn.)</li>
<li>Robert Menendez (N.J.)</li>
<li>Jeff Merkley (Ore.)</li>
<li>Barbara Mikulski (Md.)</li>
<li>Patty Murray (Wash.)</li>
<li>Jack Reed (R.I.)</li>
<li>Harry Reid (Nev.)</li>
<li>Bernie Sanders (Vt.)</li>
<li>Charles Schumer (N.Y.)</li>
<li>Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.)</li>
<li>Mark Udall (Colo.)</li>
<li>Tom Udall (N.M.)</li>
<li>Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.)</li>
<li>Ron Wyden (Ore.)</li>
</ol>
<p>Then we have the 12 probables:</p>
<blockquote><p>Another 12 senators fall into the “probably yes” camp, from Michael Bennet of Colorado to Al Franken of Minnesota and Mark Warner of Virginia. Bennet and Warner are not slam dunks given the fossil fuel interests in their home states, while Franken dropped off the “yes” list when he signed a letter with nine other Democrats in August that raised concerns about President Obama’s stance against trade sanctions on carbon-intensive goods from developing countries that do not have strong enough climate policies</p></blockquote>
<ol>
<li>Roland Burris (Ill.)</li>
<li> Michael Bennet (Colo.)</li>
<li> Jeff Bingaman (N.M.)</li>
<li> Robert Casey (Pa.)</li>
<li> Susan Collins (Maine)</li>
<li> Russ Feingold (Wis.)</li>
<li> Al Franken (Minn.)</li>
<li> Kay Hagan (N.C.)</li>
<li> Tim Johnson (S.D.)</li>
<li> Bill Nelson (Fla.)</li>
<li> Olympia Snowe (Maine)</li>
<li>Mark Warner (Va.)</li>
</ol>
<p>Finally we have the 24 fence sitters:</p>
<blockquote><p>As for the fence sitters, the list continues to swell from both directions as key senators hedge their bets.</p>
<p>For example, Sens. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) no longer reside in the “probably yes” camp given their recent statements on allocations and oversight of the carbon markets, respectively. Baucus may drive the hardest bargain as chairman of the Finance Committee, where he is sure to negotiate on behalf of coal-state Democrats who think the House-passed bill unfairly favors electric utilities that service the East and West coasts.</p>
<p>Two senators have recently been upgraded to the fence from the “probably no” camp are Sens. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) and George Voinovich (R-Ohio). Byrd has long questioned action to curb emissions but has taken a lead role on carbon sequestration language that Kerry and Boxer are trying to wrap into their proposal. Voinovich has a reputation for bipartisan consensus building, and recent signals supporting the nuclear power industry are raising hopes in some sectors that the retiring senator should still be considered in play.</p>
<p>“If you engage in a very proactive way to get a bill done, he will negotiate and compromise,” said a former Senate Republican aide.</p>
<p>E&amp;E’s analysis is based on interviews with senators, plus dozens of Democratic and Republican sources, industry and environmental groups….</p>
<p>GOP interest is significant for the climate bill’s overall prospects given that Democrats are unlikely to carry all 60 of their own votes on the floor.</p>
<p>In all, E&amp;E now lists eight Republicans as “fence sitters” on the climate bill, with the two from Maine — Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe — holding firm as “probably yes” votes given their past efforts on the issue. Collins and Snowe are likely to compensate for the loss of Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Ben Nelson of Nebraska, the only Democrats listed among 11 “probably no” votes given their many comments questioning the environmental agenda of the Obama administration and Senate leaders.</p>
<p>Elsewhere, sponsors got their biggest boost when Kerry went public with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on a partnership that they had been quietly working on since the summer. The senators pledged in an Oct. 11 <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/11/opinion/11kerrygraham.html"><strong>op-ed</strong></a> that they would try to find compromise on several key areas, including nuclear power, offshore drilling and a border tax on items produced in countries that avoid high environmental standards.</p>
<p><strong>“I can see a way to get to 60 votes, and so can he, if we pull the right folks to the table and do this in the right way,” Kerry said last week. “And that’s what we’re going to do.”</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>There are also a lot of fence-sitting Dems:</p>
<blockquote><p>Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio, for example, is crafting language to help manufacturers.</p></blockquote>
<p>From July:  <a title="Permanent Link to Senate battle 2:  Sherrod Brown (D-OH) says he won’t filibuster climate bill" rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/2009/07/13/senate-battle-sherrod-brown-ohio-says-he-wont-filibuster-climate-bill/">Sherrod Brown (D-OH) says he won’t filibuster climate bill</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Michigan’s Debbie Stabenow hopes to release long-awaited agriculture ideas. And Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania will be forced to take a stand as early as next month when Boxer’s Environment and Public Works Committee holds a markup on its bill.</p>
<p>Other influential Democratic fence sitters include Michigan Sen. Carl Levin, who said last week that he expects to push at least four issues once the bill nears the floor.</p>
<p>Levin said he will be seeking a national greenhouse gas emission standard and repeal of state-specific standards. Like Franken, he said a border tax adjustment needs to be part of the bill. And Levin said he wants a “fail-safe provision in case the technologies don’t advance as quickly as some people think they will.”</p>
<p>“And you’ve got to fairly proportion the burden,” Levin added.</p>
<p>Agriculture Chairwoman Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) also remains on the fence. The two-term senator said last week that she wants to get a better grip on the effect that a climate bill would have on farmers and in the cost of food to consumers.</p>
<p>“I don’t disagree with the objective, and I hope we’ll stay focused on the objective, which is to lower our greenhouse gases and emissions and our carbon output,” Lincoln said.</p>
<p>Lincoln in past years has cosponsored efforts to address the cost fluctuations in climate legislation. Environmental groups are banking on her and Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) as key votes that get them to across the 60-vote threshold.</p>
<p>But an industry source tracking the climate debate doubts that Lincoln can sign off on climate legislation as she heads into a heated re-election battle next November. “No amount of National Wildlife Federation polling is going to help her in the delta,” the source said. “She has an issue.”</p>
<p>Election-year politics also may influence several other Democrats. Specter faces a primary challenge from his left in Rep. Joe Sestak, a campaign that has put an even larger spotlight on his vote.</p></blockquote>
<p>From August:  <a title="Permanent Link to Arlen Specter: “No doubt about” voting for cloture on the climate bill" rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/2009/08/17/arlen-specter-vote-for-cloture-on-climate-bill/">Arlen Specter: “No doubt about” voting for cloture on the climate bill</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) faces the same unemployment concerns as Lugar but with the added pressure of a 2010 re-election campaign. So far, Bayh has not drawn a significant challenger and political analyst Charlie Cook <a href="http://www.cookpolitical.com/charts/senate/raceratings.php"><strong>ranked</strong></a> the race earlier this month as “solid D” for the incumbent. But political observers still see Bayh as vulnerable to home-state concerns.</p>
<p>Other Democrats on the fence include a number of senators representing either coal-consuming or coal-producing states, including Claire McCaskill of Missouri, North Dakota Sens. Kent Conrad and Byron Dorgan, Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, Jon Tester of Montana and Jim Webb of Virginia. Conrad and Dorgan may be among the most difficult fence sitters to win over. Both have insisted for months that Senate leaders should start with energy-only legislation and save the big climate change measure for later.</p></blockquote>
<p>Beyond Nelson and Landrieu (who are listed correctly as probable no votes), Lincoln and Dorgan will be the hardest to get, I’m told.</p>
<p>We may get only 56 or 57 Democratic votes for cloture — and thus may need at least 4 and preferably 5 or more GOP’ers, which I think is now in sight.  The bill is not a sure thing, but it is likely, especially since Obama is ramping up his push.  More on that later.</p>
<p>Here is the full list of 24 on the fence:</p>
<ol>
<li>Max Baucus (Mont.)</li>
<li>Evan Bayh (Ind.)</li>
<li>Mark Begich (Alaska)</li>
<li>Sherrod Brown (Ohio)</li>
<li>Robert Byrd (W.Va.)</li>
<li>Maria Cantwell (Wash.)</li>
<li>Kent Conrad (N.D.)</li>
<li>Byron Dorgan (N.D.)</li>
<li>Lindsey Graham (S.C.)</li>
<li>Judd Gregg (N.H.)</li>
<li>George LeMieux (Fla.)</li>
<li>Carl Levin (Mich.)</li>
<li>Blanche Lincoln (Ark.)</li>
<li>Richard Lugar (Ind.)</li>
<li>John McCain (Ariz.)</li>
<li>Claire McCaskill (Mo.)</li>
<li>Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)</li>
<li>Mark Pryor (Ark.)</li>
<li>Jay Rockefeller (W.Va.)</li>
<li>Arlen Specter (Pa.)</li>
<li>Debbie Stabenow (Mich.)</li>
<li>Jon Tester (Mont.)</li>
<li>George Voinovich (Ohio)</li>
<li>Jim Webb (Va.)</li>
</ol>
<p>Those are the ones to focus attention on, especially Dorgan, Gregg, LeMieux, Lincoln, Lugar, McCain, Murkowski, and Voinovich.  Getting at least 2 of those and preferably 3 or more would probably give us the bill.</p>
<p><span class="byline noprint"> <!-- AddThis Button BEGIN --> <script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
var addthis_pub="climateprogress";
var addthis_options = 'twitter, email, stumbleupon, facebook';
var addthis_test0309 = false;
// ]]&gt;</script> <a onclick="return false" onmouseover="return addthis_open(this, '', 'http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/', 'E&amp;E News:  “At least 67 senators are in play” on climate bill; Murkowski open to voting for “cap and trade”')" onmouseout="addthis_close()" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/"></p>
<div class="addthis">Share</div>
<p></a><script src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/200/addthis_widget.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <!-- AddThis Button END --> <a title="Print" rel="nofollow" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/print/"><img class="WP-PrintIcon" style="border: 0px none ;" title="Print" src="http://climateprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-print/images/printer_famfamfam.gif" alt="Print" /></a> <a title="Print" rel="nofollow" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/print/">Print</a></p>
<div id="digg"><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
digg_url = 'http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/';
digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';
digg_skin = 'compact';
digg_window = 'new';
// ]]&gt;</script> <script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<p></span><br />
This entry was posted 												on Wednesday, October 21st, 2009 at 2:04 pm						and is filed under <a title="View all posts in Politics" rel="category tag" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/politics/">Politics</a>. 						You can follow any responses to this entry through the <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/feed/">RSS 2.0</a> feed.  													You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.<br />
 <!-- You can start editing here. --></p>
<h3 id="comments">6 Responses to “E&amp;E News:  “At least 67 senators are in play” on climate bill; Murkowski open to voting for “cap and trade””</h3>
<div class="navigation"></div>
<ol class="commentlist">
<li id="comment-167791" class="comment even thread-even depth-1">
<div id="div-comment-167791" class="comment-body">
<div class="comment-author vcard"><cite class="fn">RunawayRose</cite> <span class="says">says:</span></div>
<div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-167791">October 21, 2009 at 2:13 pm</a></div>
<p>Iowa’s got one safe “Yes” (Harkin) and one safe “No” (Grassley). I will write them again about it, especially Grassley, but I don’t know if there’s anything useful I can do about the fence-sitters.</p>
<div class="reply"></div>
</div>
</li>
<li id="comment-167793" class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1">
<div id="div-comment-167793" class="comment-body">
<div class="comment-author vcard"><cite class="fn">ecostew</cite> <span class="says">says:</span></div>
<div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-167793">October 21, 2009 at 2:21 pm</a></div>
<p>Senate receives letter from scientific organizations:<br />
 <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2009/media/1021climate_letter.pdf">http://www.aaas.org/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>news/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>releases/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2009/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>media/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>1021climate_letter.pdf</a></p>
<div class="reply"></div>
</div>
</li>
<li id="comment-167803" class="comment even thread-even depth-1">
<div id="div-comment-167803" class="comment-body">
<div class="comment-author vcard"><cite class="fn">PinkmiNi15</cite> <span class="says">says:</span></div>
<div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-167803">October 21, 2009 at 2:58 pm</a></div>
<p>I wonder why  Rollie Burris isn’t in the “full support” camp?</p>
<p>My sense is that he basically does what the leadership tells him. Plus, his old patron, Rod Blagojevich, was actually pretty progressive on the climate issue.</p>
<div class="reply"></div>
</div>
</li>
<li id="comment-167825" class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1">
<div id="div-comment-167825" class="comment-body">
<div class="comment-author vcard"><cite class="fn">Bill R</cite> <span class="says">says:</span></div>
<div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-167825">October 21, 2009 at 5:02 pm</a></div>
<p>I know you generally support the Waxman/Markey and Kerry/Boxer bills Joe, but in researching why my D Sentator Maria Cantwell is a fence sitter on this bill I ran across the fact that she has an alternate bill (will few backers and which has not passed a vote). Nonetheless, I like it’s mechanism of auctioning permits on the fossil fuel itself rather than the emissions.</p>
<p>In searching your blog I am a little disappointed you have not discussed in detail the pluses and minuses of her proposal. Or have you and can you provide a link?</p>
<p>Thanks….</p>
<div class="reply"></div>
</div>
</li>
<li id="comment-167889" class="comment even thread-even depth-1">
<div id="div-comment-167889" class="comment-body">
<div class="comment-author vcard"><cite class="fn">Mike D</cite> <span class="says">says:</span></div>
<div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-167889">October 21, 2009 at 11:11 pm</a></div>
<p>Burris has finally realized that he has absolutely nothing to lose and is starting to throw some weight around, especially on healthcare.</p>
<div class="reply"></div>
</div>
</li>
<li id="comment-167963" class="comment odd alt thread-odd thread-alt depth-1">
<div id="div-comment-167963" class="comment-body">
<div class="comment-author vcard"><cite class="fn"><a class="url" rel="external nofollow" href="http://climatedilemma.com/">Peter Wood</a></cite> <span class="says">says:</span></div>
<div class="comment-meta commentmetadata"><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-167963">October 22, 2009 at 6:05 am</a></div>
<p>Those 67 votes could be the ones that one day ratify an international agreement to reduce emissions.</p>
<div class="reply"></div>
</div>
</li>
</ol>
<div class="navigation"></div>
<div id="respond">
<h3>Leave a Reply</h3>
<div class="cancel-comment-reply"><small><a id="cancel-comment-reply-link" style="display: none;" rel="nofollow" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/#respond">Click here to cancel reply.</a></small></div>
<form id="commentform" action="http://climateprogress.org/wp-comments-post.php" method="post">
<input id="author" name="author" size="22" type="text" tabindex="1" /> <label for="author"><small>Name </small></label></p>
<input id="email" name="email" size="22" type="text" tabindex="2" /> <label for="email"><small>Mail (will not be published) </small></label></p>
<input id="url" name="url" size="22" type="text" tabindex="3" /> <label for="url"><small>Website</small></label><br />
 <!--<br />
<small><b>XHTML:</b> You can use these tags: <code>&lt;a href=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;abbr title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;acronym title=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;b&gt; &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;cite&gt; &lt;code&gt; &lt;del datetime=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;em&gt; &lt;i&gt; &lt;q cite=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt; </code></small><br />
&#8211;><br />
<textarea id="comment" cols="100%" rows="10" name="comment"></textarea></p>
<p>By submitting your comment, you agree to the <a href="http://test.cp.techprogress.org/terms">Terms of Use</a>.</p>
<input id="submit" name="submit" type="submit" value="Submit Comment" tabindex="5" />
<input id="comment_post_ID" name="comment_post_ID" type="hidden" value="12988" />
<input id="comment_parent" name="comment_parent" type="hidden" value="0" />
<input id="acp-preview" name="acp-preview" type="button" value="Preview" tabindex="6" />
<div id="ajax-comment-preview">Click the &#8220;Preview&#8221; button to preview your comment here.</div>
</form>
</div>
<div id="sidebar">
<form id="searchform" action="http://climateprogress.org" method="get">
<div>
<input id="s" name="s" type="text" />
<input id="searchsubmit" type="submit" value="SEARCH" /></div>
</form>
<h3 class="aboutlink"><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/index.php/about">About Climate Progress</a></h3>
<h3>Subscribe</h3>
<p><a class="rss" title="Climate Progress RSS feed" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/climateprogress/lCrX"><img src="http://climateprogress.org/wp-content/themes/cp3/images/rss32.png" alt="RSS Icon" />RSS</a> —  18649  Readers</p>
<p><a class="subsc" title="Climate Progress Email" href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=1261800&amp;loc=en_US"><img src="http://climateprogress.org/wp-content/themes/cp3/images/email-32px.gif" alt="Email icon" />Subscribe by Email</a></p>
<p><a class="subsc" title="Climate Progress Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/climateprogress"><img src="http://climateprogress.org/wp-content/themes/cp3/images/twitter_32.png" alt="Twitter icon" />Follow Climate Progress on Twitter</a></p>
<div id="advertisement">Advertisement<br />
 <script src="http://csm.rotator.hadj7.adjuggler.net/servlet/ajrotator/616582/0/vj?z=csm&amp;dim=616028&amp;kw=&amp;click="></script><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="300" height="250" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="menu" value="false" /><param name="play" value="true" /><param name="loop" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="false" /><param name="src" value="http://cdn.hadj7.adjuggler.net/banners/Client18232/1256158402026_FDL_Public-Option_300x250.swf?FILE1=&amp;FILE2=&amp;FILE3=&amp;FILE4=&amp;clickTAG=http://csm.rotator.hadj7.adjuggler.net/servlet/ajrotator/616582/0/cj?ajkey=V12B7170C92J-573I700K16630182A4E64182A4E64K18235K18233QK16676QQP0G01G0G0Q53&amp;clickTAG1=&amp;clickTAG2=&amp;clickTAG3=&amp;clickTAG4=&amp;clickTAG5=" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="300" height="250" src="http://cdn.hadj7.adjuggler.net/banners/Client18232/1256158402026_FDL_Public-Option_300x250.swf?FILE1=&amp;FILE2=&amp;FILE3=&amp;FILE4=&amp;clickTAG=http://csm.rotator.hadj7.adjuggler.net/servlet/ajrotator/616582/0/cj?ajkey=V12B7170C92J-573I700K16630182A4E64182A4E64K18235K18233QK16676QQP0G01G0G0Q53&amp;clickTAG1=&amp;clickTAG2=&amp;clickTAG3=&amp;clickTAG4=&amp;clickTAG5=" swliveconnect="false" allowscriptaccess="always" loop="true" play="true" menu="false" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" quality="high"></embed></object><noscript>&lt;iframe width=&#8221;300&#8243; height=&#8221;250&#8243; noresize scrolling=No frameborder=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0 src=&#8221;http://csm.rotator.hadj7.adjuggler.net/servlet/ajrotator/616582/0/vh?z=csm&amp;dim=616028&amp;kw=&amp;click=&#8221;&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://csm.rotator.hadj7.adjuggler.net/servlet/ajrotator/616582/0/cc?z=csm&#8221;&gt;&lt;img src=&#8221;http://csm.rotator.hadj7.adjuggler.net/servlet/ajrotator/616582/0/vc?z=csm&amp;dim=616028&amp;kw=&amp;click=&amp;abr=$imginiframe&#8221; width=&#8221;300&#8243; height=&#8221;250&#8243; border=&#8221;0&#8243;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</noscript></div>
<h3>Most Popular Posts</h3>
<ul>
<li><a id="destacado_12912" title="Bloomberg interview of Dubner and Caldeira backs up my reporting on error-riddled Superfreakonomics.  Dubner is baffled that Caldeira 'doesn’t believe geoengineering can work without cutting emissions.'" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/20/breaking-bloomberg-interview-of-dubner-and-caldeira-backs-up-my-account-dubner-is-baffled-that-caldeira-doesn%e2%80%99t-believe-geoengineering-can-work-without-cutting-emissions/">Bloomberg interview of Dubner and Caldeira backs up my reporting on error-riddled Superfreakonomics. Dubner is baffled that Caldeira &#8216;doesn’t believe geoengineering can work without cutting emissions.&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a id="destacado_11904" title="Time magazine names me one of the Heroes of the Environment 2009 and The Web's most influential climate-change blogger" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/09/27/time-magazine-names-joe-romm-one-of-the-heroes-of-the-environment-2009/">Time magazine names me one of the Heroes of the Environment 2009 and The Web&#8217;s most influential climate-change blogger</a></li>
<li><a id="destacado_5170" title="An Introduction to Climate Progress" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/03/28/an-introduction-to-climate-progress/">An Introduction to Climate Progress</a></li>
<li><a id="destacado_10542" title="Climate Progress at three years:  Why I blog" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/08/27/climate-progress-at-three-years-why-i-blog-george-orwell/">Climate Progress at three years:  Why I blog</a></li>
<li><a id="destacado_8451" title="The U.S. House of Representatives approves landmark (bipartisan!) climate bill, 219 - 212.  Waxman-Markey would complete America's transition to a clean energy economy, which started with the stimulus bill." href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/06/26/house-approves-landmark-bipartisan-clean-energy-and-climate-bill-final-vote-waxman-markey/">The U.S. House of Representatives approves landmark (bipartisan!) climate bill, 219 &#8211; 212. Waxman-Markey would complete America&#8217;s transition to a clean energy economy, which started with the stimulus bill.</a></li>
<li><a id="destacado_5186" title="Introduction to climate economics:  Why even strong climate action has such a low total cost -- one tenth of a penny on the dollar" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/03/30/global-warming-economics-low-cost-high-benefit/">Introduction to climate economics: Why even strong climate action has such a low total cost &#8212; one tenth of a penny on the dollar</a></li>
<li><a id="destacado_5123" title="How the world can (and will) stabilize at 350 to 450 ppm:  The full global warming solution (updated)" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/03/26/full-global-warming-solution-350-450-ppm-technologies-efficiency-renewables/">How the world can (and will) stabilize at 350 to 450 ppm:  The full global warming solution (updated)</a></li>
<li><a id="destacado_5015" title="Is the global economy a Ponzi scheme?" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/03/08/ponzi-scheme-madoff-friedman-natural-capital-renewable-resources/">Is the global economy a Ponzi scheme?</a></li>
<li><a id="destacado_5124" title="An introduction to global warming impacts:  Hell and High Water " href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/03/22/an-introduction-to-global-warming-impacts-hell-and-high-water/">An introduction to global warming impacts:  Hell and High Water </a></li>
<li><a id="destacado_4052" title="An introduction to the core climate solutions" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/22/an-introduction-to-the-core-climate-solutions/">An introduction to the core climate solutions</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Recent Comments</h3>
<ul id="recentcomments">
<li class="recentcomments"><a class="url" rel="external nofollow" href="http://www.checklisttowardzerocarbon.wordpress.com/">ken levenson</a> on <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/22/revkin-mistakes-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-168439">No wonder polling shows more people don’t know the scientific evidence that humans are warming the Earth has grown stronger. Revkin stunner on NPR: “I’ve made missteps. I’ve made probably more mistakes this year in my print stories than I had before.”</a></li>
<li class="recentcomments"><a class="url" rel="external nofollow" href="http://pacific-kvar.com/">mike roddy</a> on <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/23/inhofe%e2%80%99s-climate-change-denying-copenhagen-%e2%80%98truth-squad%e2%80%99-expands-to-a-%e2%80%98truth-squad-of-three-%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-168434">Inhofe’s climate change-denying Copenhagen ‘truth squad’ expands to a ‘truth squad of three.’</a></li>
<li class="recentcomments"><a class="url" rel="external nofollow" href="http://link/">Settor63</a> on <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/02/shipping-containers-provide-affordable-housing/comment-page-1/#comment-168419">Shipping containers provide affordable housing</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Recognition</h3>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/opinion/08friedman.html">The indispensable blog</a>&#8221; — Tom Friedman, <em>New York Times</em></p>
<p>Rolling Stone: &#8220;<a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/26754176/the_rs_100_agents_of_change/3">America&#8217;s fiercest climate-change activist-blogger lets it rip</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Climate Progress named one of <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1730759_1731034_1731042,00.html">Time Magazine</a>&#8217;s Favorite Websites for the Environment</p>
<p>U.S. News &amp; World Report names Joe Romm as <a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/energy/2009/03/31/joe-romm-influential-liberal-climate-change-expert-and-blogger.html?loomia_ow=t0:s0:a41:g2:r7:c0.298144:b23521932&amp;s_cid=loomia:epas-lisa-jackson-is-at-the-center-of-obamas-climate-change-policy">one of the most influential energy and environmental policymakers in the Obama era</a></p>
<h3>Buy Joe Romm&#8217;s Book</h3>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Hell-High-Water-Warming-Politics/dp/006117212X"><img src="http://climateprogress.org/wp-content/themes/cp3/images/HH125.jpg" border="0" alt="Cover image of Joe Romm's book, Hell and High Water ... and What We Should Do" /></a></p>
<h3>Categories</h3>
<ul class="clean">
<li class="cat-item cat-item-15"><a title="View all posts filed under Best PPTs" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/best-ppts/">Best PPTs</a> (3)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-1"><a title="Default category for uncategorized items." href="http://climateprogress.org/category/climateprogress/">Climate Progress</a> (622)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-12"><a title="View all posts filed under Economics" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/economics/">Economics</a> (168)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-5"><a title="View all posts filed under Extreme Weather" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/extreme-weather/">Extreme Weather</a> (159)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-23"><a title="View all posts filed under Geoengineering" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/geoengineering/">Geoengineering</a> (2)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-17"><a title="View all posts filed under Greenwashing" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/greenwashing/">Greenwashing</a> (29)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-10"><a title="View all posts filed under Humor" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/humor/">Humor</a> (178)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-13"><a title="View all posts filed under International" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/international/">International</a> (135)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-9"><a title="View all posts filed under Media" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/media/">Media</a> (264)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-11"><a title="View all posts filed under Offsets" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/offsets/">Offsets</a> (45)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-16"><a title="View all posts filed under Peak Oil" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/peak-oil/">Peak Oil</a> (13)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-3"><a title="View all posts filed under Politics" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/politics/">Politics</a> (798)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-22"><a title="View all posts filed under Ponzi Scheme" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/ponzi-scheme/">Ponzi Scheme</a> (14)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-20"><a title="View all posts filed under Rhetoric" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/rhetoric/">Rhetoric</a> (15)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-4"><a title="View all posts filed under Science" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/science/">Science</a> (344)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-2"><a title="View all posts filed under Solutions" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/solutions/">Solutions</a> (560)</li>
<li class="cat-item cat-item-19"><a title="View all posts filed under Uncharacteristically Blunt Scientists" href="http://climateprogress.org/category/uncharacteristically-blunt-scientists/">Uncharacteristically Blunt Scientists</a> (11)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Archives</h3>
<ul>
<li><a title="October 2009" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/">October 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="September 2009" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/09/">September 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="August 2009" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/08/">August 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="July 2009" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/07/">July 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="June 2009" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/06/">June 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="May 2009" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/">May 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="April 2009" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/">April 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="March 2009" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/03/">March 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="February 2009" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/">February 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="January 2009" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/">January 2009</a></li>
<li><a title="December 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/">December 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="November 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/11/">November 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="October 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/">October 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="September 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/">September 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="August 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/">August 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="July 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/">July 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="June 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/06/">June 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="May 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/">May 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="April 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/">April 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="March 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/">March 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="February 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/">February 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="January 2008" href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/">January 2008</a></li>
<li><a title="December 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/12/">December 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="November 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/">November 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="October 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/">October 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="September 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/09/">September 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="August 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/08/">August 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="July 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/07/">July 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="June 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/06/">June 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="May 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/05/">May 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="April 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/04/">April 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="March 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/">March 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="February 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/02/">February 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="January 2007" href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/01/">January 2007</a></li>
<li><a title="December 2006" href="http://climateprogress.org/2006/12/">December 2006</a></li>
<li><a title="November 2006" href="http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/">November 2006</a></li>
<li><a title="October 2006" href="http://climateprogress.org/2006/10/">October 2006</a></li>
<li><a title="September 2006" href="http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/">September 2006</a></li>
<li><a title="August 2006" href="http://climateprogress.org/2006/08/">August 2006</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!--<a href="/2009" mce_href="/2009">2009</a> | <a href="/2008" mce_href="/2008">2008</a> | <a href="/2007" mce_href="/2007">2007</a> | <a href="/2006" mce_href="/2006">2006</a></p>
<p>&#8211;></p>
<h3>News from ClimateArk.org</h3>
<ul>
<li><a title="ClimateWire: President Obama will try to push the Senate climate bill forward Friday with an energy-themed speech at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, just days before the start of a marathon series of hearings featuring testimony from top administration officials.  The White House said Obama's remarks covering &quot;American leadership in clean energy&quot; will dovetail with the Senate's effort to place a first-ever economywide cap on greenhouse gas emissions.  Obama largely stayed out of ..." href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/10/21/21climatewire-obama-to-give-senate-climate-bill-a-push-wit-53858.html">Obama to give senate climate bill a push with MIT speech</a></li>
<li><a title="Associated Press: Texas and Alabama get far less money every year from offshore drilling in their state waters than advocates say Florida can expect, the state's environmental chief told a House panel Wednesday.  Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Michael Sole said Texas gets about $45 million and Alabama anywhere from $50 million to $300 million. That compares to an estimate by the pro-drilling group Florida Energy Associates that Florida's treasury can expect to rake in $2.25 billion a ..." href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091022/ap_on_bi_ge/us_offshore_drilling">Fla. House panel discusses offshore drilling</a></li>
<li><a title="Associated Press: With demand growing for ethanol produced from sources other than corn, researchers at Oklahoma State University said Wednesday that state agriculture producers could someday grow sweet sorghum or switchgrass as cash crops.  Division scientists and engineers from OSU's Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources spoke during a &quot;biofuels field day&quot; at the university's South Central Research Station in Chickasha about the potential of crops that could be grown by Oklahoma ..." href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091022/ap_on_bi_ge/us_biofuels_okla">OSU experts discuss sweet sorghum use in ethanol</a></li>
<li><a title="Telegraph: Mercedes, a 27-year-old sow, has spent the last 25 years in a small enclosure at Edinburgh Zoo.  But she had now been moved to a new four-acre enclosure at the Highland Wildlife Park outside Kingussie - one of the coldest parts of the country.  The bear was brought to the UK after it was rescued in Canada where it was about to be shot for repeatedly roaming into a small town.  The name came from Mercedes Benz, which funded the large mammal's flight to the UK in 1984, and ..." href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/wildlife/6407065/Britains-only-polar-bear-moved-north-to-escape-climate-change.html">Britain&#8217;s only polar bear moved north to escape climate change</a></li>
<li><a title="Agence France-Presse: For people fed up with their mobile telephone or iPod batteries running out, Japan's Toshiba Corp. announced Thursday the launch of a portable fuel-cell that can power up digital gadgets on the move.  With an injection of methanol, the fuel-cell generates electricity through a chemical reaction with oxygen to recharge mobile digital electronic devices via a USB cable.  The high-tech giant, which sees a bright future for fuel cells, said battery exhaustion had become a &quot;major ..." href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/afp/20091022/tc_afp/lifestylejapantechnologyenergycompanytoshiba">Japan:  Toshiba launches portable fuel-cell for mobiles</a></li>
<li><a title="Telegraph: The apocalyptic map was launched by Government ministers at the opening of a new exhibition at the Science Museum.  'Prove it -- everything you need to know to believe in climate change' is aimed at educating the public about the dangers of uncontrollable global warming.  The 'Day After Tomorrow' map shows what the world will look like if temperatures rise beyond four degrees C (7 degrees F). It was produced by the Met Office, that predicts temperature rises may reach the ..." href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/6407050/Day-after-tomorrow-map-shows-consequences-of-climate-change.html">United Kingdom:  &#8216;Day after tomorrow&#8217; map shows consequences of climate change</a></li>
<li><a title="Reuters: California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger put his muscle behind a &quot;green&quot; football stadium for Los Angeles on Thursday by signing a bill to accelerate construction for a private developer's proposed $800 million sports complex.  The bill helps the project clear environmental hurdles for construction in the City of Industry in Los Angeles County, which hopes to attract a National Football League professional football franchise after losing the Los Angeles Rams to St. Louis in ..." href="http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE59L5IL20091022?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=environmentNews">United States:  Schwarzenegger speeds up &#8220;green&#8221; football stadium</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Clean Energy Links  <a rel="toggle[links]" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/#"><img src="http://climateprogress.org/wp-content/themes/cp3/images/expand.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a></h3>
<div id="links" style="display: none;">
<ul class="clean">
<li><a href="http://www.celsias.com/">Celsias</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.cleanbreak.ca/">Clean Break</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.getenergysmartnow.com/">Get Energy Smart Now</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.greenoptions.com/blog">Green Options</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sustainablestyle.org/">Sustainable Style</a></li>
<li><a href="http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/">The Energy Blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://watthead.blogspot.com/">WattHead</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.worldchanging.com/">WorldChanging</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<h3>Links  <a rel="toggle[links2]" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/21/swing-fence-sitters-senators-cap-and-trade-climate-energy-bill/#"><img src="http://climateprogress.org/wp-content/themes/cp3/images/expand.gif" border="0" alt="" /></a></h3>
<div id="links2" style="display: none;">
<ul class="clean">
<li><a title="A layman’s take on the science of Global Warming featuring a guide on How to Talk to a Climate Sceptic." href="http://scienceblogs.com/illconsidered/">A Few Things Ill Considered</a></li>
<li><a title="Promoting integrity in the use of climate science in government" href="http://www.climatesciencewatch.org/">Climate Science Watch</a></li>
<li><a title="A project of the Climate Institute" href="http://www.climate.org/">Climate.org</a></li>
<li><a title="Climate change information service" href="http://climatewire.org/">ClimateWire</a></li>
<li><a title="Clearing the PR pollution that clouds climate science" href="http://www.desmogblog.com/">DeSmogBlog</a></li>
<li><a title="From Island Press" href="http://blog.islandpress.org/">Eco-Compass</a></li>
<li><a title="�My heart is moved by all I cannot save�" href="http://greenfyre.wordpress.com/">Greenfyre&#8217;s</a></li>
<li><a title="The environmental news blog | Grist" href="http://gristmill.grist.org/">Gristmill</a></li>
<li><a title="Dispatches from the Global Youth Climate Movement" href="http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/">It’s Getting Hot In Here</a></li>
<li><a title="Climate science from climate scientists" href="http://www.realclimate.org/">RealClimate</a></li>
<li><a title="Daily Climate News and Opinion" href="http://solveclimate.com/">Solve Climate</a></li>
<li><a title="Hard-hitting progressive news, research and analysis" href="http://thinkprogress.org/">Think Progress</a></li>
<li><a title="Dedicated to everything that has a modern aesthetic yet is environmentally responsible" href="http://treehugger.com/">TreeHugger</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p><!-- close sidebar --></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/senate-pushing-climate-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Executive Order Firmly Commits Federal Agencies to Sustainability</title>
		<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/executive-order-firmly-commits-federal-agencies-to-sustainability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/executive-order-firmly-commits-federal-agencies-to-sustainability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuwingenergy.com/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, President Obama issued Executive Order 13514, which lays out significant green goals for the U.S. government.  In the next 90 days, all federal agencies must set emissions reduction goals for 2020.
The impact of the order promises to be huge, considering the federal government&#8217;s sheer size: it occupies nearly 500,000 buildings and operates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, President Obama issued Executive Order 13514, which lays out significant green goals for the U.S. government.  In the next 90 days, all federal agencies must set emissions reduction goals for 2020.</p>
<p>The impact of the order promises to be huge, considering the federal government&#8217;s sheer size: it occupies nearly 500,000 buildings and operates more than 600,000 vehicles.</p>
<p>The new executive order signed by the president, mandates agencies across the federal government to &#8220;measure, manage, and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions toward agency defined targets,&#8221; the White House said in a statement.</p>
<p>&#8220;The federal government can and should lead by example when it comes to creating innovative ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase energy efficiency, conserve water, reduce waste, and use environmentally-responsible products and technologies,&#8221; Obama said in a statement.</p>
<p>Another key component of the Executive Order, is a green procurement policy to cover 95% of new contracts and acquisitions.  With the governments huge buying power, which exceeds more than a half trillion dollars spent on goods and services annually, they will carry a lot of weight.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s order lays out a handful of additional requirements, designed to save costs and cut waste in the government.   The list includes low-hanging fruit targeted at green IT, and the encourages staff to look at alternatives to traditional commuting and business travel.</p>
<ol>
<li>Procurement preference for EPEAT (registered electronic products)</li>
<li>Implementing power management, energy-efficient or environmentally preferable features on all eligible agency electronic products</li>
<li>Employing environmentally sound practices with disposition of all agency electronics</li>
<li>Procurement of Energy Star and FEMP designated electronic equipment</li>
<li><strong>Implementing best management practices for energy-efficient management of servers and Federal data centers</strong></li>
<li>Pursuing costs effective, innovative strategies, such as vegetated roofs, to minimize consumption of energy, water, and materials.</li>
<li>Managing existing buildings systems to reduce the consumption of energy, water and materials, and identifying alternatives to renovation</li>
<li>Identifying opportunities to consolidate and dispose of existing assets, optimize real-property portfolio, and reduce associated environmental impacts</li>
<li>Ensuring the rehabilitation of federally owned historic buildings utilizes best practices and technologies in retrofitting to promote long-term viability</li>
</ol>
<p>The most significant downstream effect, will be the bringing sustainability thinking to 1.8 million government workers&#8217; daily lives.  Obama&#8217;s executive order will hopefully spread the green message far beyond Washington D.C. and into American&#8217;s daily lives.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/2009fedleader_eo_rel.pdf" target="_blank">Executive Order </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/executive-order-firmly-commits-federal-agencies-to-sustainability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clean Technology Venture Capital Investment in 3Q Totals $1.59 Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/clean-technology-venture-capital-investment-in-3q-totals-1-59-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/clean-technology-venture-capital-investment-in-3q-totals-1-59-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuwingenergy.com/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cleantech Group along with Deloitte, two clean tech companies , today released preliminary 3Q 2009 results for clean technology venture investments in North America, Europe, China, and India totaling $1.59 billion across 134 companies.
That means total clean tech venture capital funding this year is already about $3.8 billion &#8211; which puts total funding on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cleantech Group along with Deloitte, two clean tech companies , today released preliminary 3Q 2009 results for clean technology venture investments in North America, Europe, China, and India totaling $1.59 billion across 134 companies.</p>
<p>That means total clean tech venture capital funding this year is already about $3.8 billion &#8211; which puts total funding on pace to exceed every year except 2008.</p>
<p>Dallas Kachan, Managing Director, at Cleantech Group, said, &#8220;The billions in government funding being allocated globally in clean technology have begun emboldening private capital, which has in turn helped propel clean technology to the leading venture investment sector, now eclipsing bio tech and IT.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The extension of tax credits for renewable-based power generation along with government stimulus and regulatory requirements to meet renewable portfolio standards (RPS) are helping to drive continued investment on the part of venture capitalist and utilities into the clean tech sector,&#8221; said Scott Smith, U.S. leader of Deloitte&#8217;s Clean Tech practices.  &#8220;Utilities are increasingly bringing their access to capital to the sector through direct investment and power purchase agreements, driving new projects and increased capacity.  We continue to see utilities investing in wind and solar and expect this trend to continue as clean tech projects become more economically viable and desirable for utilities.&#8221;</p>
<p>The leading clean technology investment sector was solar, which rose from the previous quarter&#8217;s 12% to 28% of venture investment, but still only received $451 million, down from a high of $1.2 billion invested in 3Q 2008.  &#8220;Solar thermal was the leading energy source procured through power purchase agreements in the first half of 2009,&#8221; said Scott Smith, U.S. leader of Deloitte&#8217;s  clean tech practice.</p>
<p>Green buildings-including energy efficient buildings.glass and lighting sub sectors, had a strong quarter also, with investment of $1110 million.</p>
<p>In the leading clean tech IPO of the quarter, and one of the most significant clean tech exits to date, A 123 Systems made its long awaited debut on the NASDAQ Global Market, in which the company raised #380 million at a company valuation of $1.3 billion (which rose to$1.9 billion by the close of day one trading).  Other clean technology IPOs recorded in 3Q 2009 were wind farm developer Indian Energy, which began trading on London&#8217;s AIM, raising $16.2 million, and India-based Euro Multivision which raised $13.5 million on the Bombay Stock Exchange for the company&#8217;s photovoltaic solar cell manufacturing unit.</p>
<p>North America accounted for 67% of the total venture capital funding, raising USD $1.1 billion, up 8% form 2Q 2009.  The region accounted for the four largest venture capital deals (Solyndra, Tesla Motors, SolFocus, and Serious Materials) as well as the largest IPO (A123Systems).  California led the way with $655 million in investment, followed by Colorado with $47 million.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantech.com/about/pressreleases/20090930.cfm" target="_blank">Clean technology venture investment continued recovering in 3Q09 spurred by economic stimulus investment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/clean-technology-venture-capital-investment-in-3q-totals-1-59-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New EPA Rule to Require the Use of Best Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/new-epa-rule-to-require-the-use-of-best-technologies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/new-epa-rule-to-require-the-use-of-best-technologies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuwingenergy.com/?p=840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Appearing at a climate summit in Los Angles, CA today Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson will announce the administration&#8217;s plan to regulate industrial global warming pollution, with or without the support of Congress.  In May, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed global warming standards for motor vehicles, applauded by the auto industry.  Under the rules [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appearing at a climate summit in Los Angles, CA today Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson will announce the administration&#8217;s plan to regulate industrial global warming pollution, with or without the support of Congress.  In May, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed global warming standards for motor vehicles, applauded by the auto industry.  Under the rules of the Clean Air Act, when these regulations go into effect in March 2010, all major greenhouse gas polluters &#8211; from coal-fired power plants and oil refiners to methane-emitting landfills &#8211; are automatically subject to regulation.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s announcement by the EPA comes hours after the introduction of legislation to limit global warming pollution by Sen. Jon Kerry (D-MA_ and Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) this morning, two-and-a-half years after the U.S. Supreme Court mandated action on global warming pollution, and 17 years after the United States ratified the Rio de Janeiro climate treaty, pledging to &#8220;prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/21ACDBA8FD5126A88525764100798AAD" target="_blank">New EPA rule will require use of best technologies to reduce greenhouse gases from large facilities/small businesses and farms exempt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/new-epa-rule-to-require-the-use-of-best-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsweek&#8217;s New Green Rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/newsweek-new-green-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/newsweek-new-green-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuwingenergy.com/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past Monday, Newsweek published their first annual Green Rankings.  Unlike many other corporate environmental rankings that are abounding in the marketplace, Newsweek has managed to compile, rate, and rank the environmental pperformance, achievements, and reputation of the 500 largest publicly held companies that trade on either the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or NASDAQ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past Monday, Newsweek published their first annual Green Rankings.  Unlike many other corporate environmental rankings that are abounding in the marketplace, Newsweek has managed to compile, rate, and rank the environmental pperformance, achievements, and reputation of the 500 largest publicly held companies that trade on either the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) or NASDAQ (the two largest American stock markets).</p>
<p>Joel Makower, in his article &#8220;Inside Newsweek&#8217;s Green Corporate Rankings&#8221;, said that, &#8220;It may well be the best effort yet to rigorously and comprehensively assess the mainstream corporate marketplace &#8211; at least in the U.S.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Newsweek rankings assess the S&amp;P 500 on three metrics:</p>
<ul>
<li>An &#8220;Environmental Impact Score&#8221;: based on more than 700 metrics (45%)
<ul>
<li>Company emissions</li>
<li>Natural resource use</li>
<li>Waste disposal</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>A &#8220;Green Policies Score&#8221;: an analysis of corporate policies and initiatives (45%)
<ul>
<li>Climate change policies and performance</li>
<li>Pollution policies and performance</li>
<li>Product impacts</li>
<li>Environmental stewardship and management</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>A &#8220;Reputation Survey Score&#8221;: resulting from a survey of CEOs, corporate environmental officers, and academics (10%)
<ul>
<li>The survey asked respondents to rate companies as &#8220;leaders&#8221; or &#8220;laggards in five key &#8220;green areas&#8221;.
<ul>
<li>Green performance</li>
<li>Commitment</li>
<li>Communication</li>
<li>Track record</li>
<li>Ambassadors</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Top 10 Ranked Companies</p>
<ol>
<li>Hewlett Packard</li>
<li>Dell</li>
<li>Johnson &amp; Johnson</li>
<li>Intel</li>
<li>IBM</li>
<li>State Street</li>
<li>Nike</li>
<li>Bristol-Myers Squibb</li>
<li>Applied Materials</li>
<li>Starbucks</li>
</ol>
<p>While this cross-industry ranking of environmental performance, policy and reputation may be imperfect, as all of its peers are, it will undoubtedly add to the corporate race towards improved environmental sustainability.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/gwmEnergy/idUS97646616220090921" target="_blank">Inside Newsweek&#8217;s new green corporate rankings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/newsweek-new-green-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court Says States May Sue Utilities Over GHGs</title>
		<link>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/federal-court-says-states-may-sue-utilities-over-ghgs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/federal-court-says-states-may-sue-utilities-over-ghgs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bcole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.neuwingenergy.com/?p=828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal appeals court ruled Monday that states trying to combat global warming can sue six electric utilities to force them to cut the greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted by their power plants in 20 states.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan reinstated the lawsuits after a lower court judge tossed out the actions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal appeals court ruled Monday that states trying to combat global warming can sue six electric utilities to force them to cut the greenhouse gases (GHG) emitted by their power plants in 20 states.</p>
<p>The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan reinstated the lawsuits after a lower court judge tossed out the actions brought in 2004 by eight states, New York City and three land trusts.  The lawsuits had accuse the companies of being among the largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the world and sought to force them to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions.</p>
<p>The appeals court said the lower court judge erred in ruling that the issue was a political one that was not meant to be decided by the courts.  The court said that not every case with political overtones has to be kept out of the courts.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is error to equate a political question with a political case,&#8221; the court wrote. &#8220;Given the checks and balances among the three branches of our government, the judiciary can no more usurp executive and legislative prerogatives than it can decline to decide matters within its jurisdiction simply because such matters may have political ramifications.&#8221;</p>
<p>The appeals court noted that the legislative branch was free to amend the Clean Air Act to regulate carbon dioxide emissions, and the executive branch can regulate emissions through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).</p>
<p>The states bringing the lawsuit are California, Connecticut, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin.  New York City and three nonprofit land trusts also are part of the litigation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-GreenBusiness/idUSTRE58K4VT20090921" target="_blank">U.S. courts reinstates emissions suite vs. utilities</a></p>
<p>David Hawkins, director of the National Resource Defense Council&#8217;s climate programs, said &#8220;The import of this ruling is that failure of Congress or EPA to act on GHG will not immunize emitters from legal action to compel reductions in emissions.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.neuwingenergy.com/news/federal-court-says-states-may-sue-utilities-over-ghgs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
